论文WhatShouldTodaysPoetsWriteAbout是关于WhatShouldTodaysPoetsWriteAbout方面的的相关大学硕士和相关本科毕业论文以及相关youshouldwrite论文开题报告范文和职称论文写作参考文献资料下载。
Guo Lusheng, a renowned poet popularly known as Shizhi, has an important place in the Chinese poetic circle, regarded as the founder of the “misty” genre of Chinese poetry. Yu Xiuhua, a new member of this circle, came from a farming background. Yu, who has had cerebral palsy since childhood, has endured untold suffering in her life. Her poems, however, are now well received by Chinese readers, and have been bestsellers in recent times. Though both are remarkable poets, Shizhi and Yu did not have any interaction until recently, when he openly criticized her at a book launch.
In a recent public speech, Shizhi denounced Yu writing that to her, “an ideal life was to drink coffee, read and talk, and do similar leisurely things.” Shizhi scathingly said that Yu has forgotten that a poet’s responsibility is to think of the nation and mankind. In Yu’s case, he said her responsibility was to write about the pain and misery of ordinary farmers and their pursuit of a better life. In reply, Yu vehemently claimed that Shizhi was insulting others because of his elevated position in the poetic circle.
The public and media have reacted strongly to their altercation, with different people taking different views.
A brave voice
Tang Shan （Beijing Youth Daily）： In his remark, Shizhi expressed his concern for the future of vernacular poetry, arguing that poems should refl ect the life of the masses and the nature of a nation. He expressed his dissatisfaction with Yu Xiuhua’s way of life, instead of her work.
Shizhi is not commenting on readers’indifference to culture, but is explaining the many problems that vernacular poetry faces. This shows his bravery and sense of responsibility. It’s a pity that not many such voices are heard these days. Many people misunderstood Shizhi’s concerns.
The kind of anxiety embedded in Shizhi’s criticism has been there since the birth of Chinese vernacular poetry which is much different from the classical style, plaguing poets for generations.
Chinese society is heading toward diversifi cation, so it’s natural to hear different voices. As long as these voices do not distort the facts or exaggerate, they should be shown tolerance. Shizhi could have chosen to keep silent, but he did not. He expressed his worries over the current situation and over the future of vernacular poetry. Even if he is unable to provide a solution, his appeal and introspection are still of signifi -cance to Chinese vernacular poetry.
总结:本文是一篇关于WhatShouldTodaysPoetsWriteAbout论文范文，可作为相关选题参考,和写作参考文献。
参考文献：