论文心理护理干预对老年糖尿病患者康复效果分析是适合糖尿病患者论文写作的大学硕士及相关本科毕业论文，相关糖尿病一般能活多少年开题报告范文和学术职称论文参考文献下载。
[摘 要] 目的 研討心理护理干预对老年糖尿病患者康复的效果的影响.方法 方便选取该院2016年7月—2017年9月接诊的70例老年糖尿病患者,将患者纳入随机对照试验中,以随机数字表法为分组依据,将患者分为心理护理组 和常规护理组,每组35例.常规护理组采取常规护理干预方案,心理护理组采取心理护理干预方案,观察护理干预效果.结果 干预前,心理护理组FBG（8.76±2.15）mmol/L,常规护理组FBG（8.78±2.17）mmol/L,差异无统计学意义（t等于0.038 7,P等于0.969 2）；干预前,心理护理组PBG（13.12±2.13）mmol/L,常规护理组FBG（13.15±2.16）mmol/L,差异无统计学意义（t等于0.058 5,P等于0.953 5）；心理护理组HbA1c（8.33±0.41）%,常规护理组HbA1c（8.37±0.43）%,差异无统计学意义（t等于0.398 2,P等于0.691 7）；干预后,心理护理组FBG（6.76±1.03）mmol/L,常规护理组FBG（7.94±1.77）mmol/L,差异有统计学意义（t等于3.408 8,P等于0.001 1）；干预后,心理护理组PBG（8.66±0.74）mmol/L,常规护理组FBG（9.45±1.44）mmol/L,差异有统计学意义（t等于2.886 7,P等于0.005 2）；心理护理组HbA1c（7.14±0.16）%,常规护理组HbA1c（7.66±0.34）%,差异有统计学意义（t等于8.186 9,P等于0.000 0）；干预前；心理护理组SAS评分（53.12±1.45）分,常规护理组SAS评分（53.15±1.46）分,差异无统计学意义（t等于0.086 2,P等于0.931 5）；干预后,心理护理组SAS评分（49.76±1.22）分,常规护理组SAS评分（51.34±1.37）分,差异有统计学意义（t等于5.095 4,P等于0.000 0）；干预前；心理护理组SDS评分（55.46±2.11）分,常规护理组SDS评分（55.49±2.13）分,差异无统计学意义（t等于0.059 1,P等于0.953 0）；干预后,心理护理组SDS评分（51.02±1.05）分,常规护理组SDS评分（53.46±1.55）分,差异有统计学意义（t等于7.710 4,P等于0.000 0）.结论 心理护理干预在老年糖尿病患者的康复当中有重要作用,有利于控制患者血糖,提高生存质量,改善其不良心理,值得临床推广.
[关键词] 心理护理；糖尿病；康复；血糖
[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2018）02（c）-0159-04
Effect of Psychological Nursing Intervention on the Rehabilitation of Old Diabetic Patients
ZHANG Pan-pan
Nursing Department, Henan People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450000 China
[Abstract] Objective To discuss the effect of psychological nursing intervention on the rehabilitation effect of old diabetic patients. Methods 70 old diabetic patients in our hospital from July 2016 to September 2017 were conveniently selected and randomly divided into the psychological care group and the routine care group, each of which contains 35 patients. The routine nursing group adopted the routine nursing intervention scheme, and the psychological nursing group adopted the psychological nursing intervention scheme, observing the effect of nursing intervention. Results Before the intervention, FBG（8.76±2.15） mmol/L in the psychological care group and FBG（8.78±2.17）mmol/L in the conventional care group had no significant difference （t等于0.038 7, P等于0.969 2）. Before intervention, PBG（13.12±2.13）mmol/L in the psychological care group and FBG （13.15±2.16）mmol/L in the conventional care group had no significant difference（t等于0.058 5, P等于0.953 5）. There was no significant difference in HbA1c （8.33±0.41）% and HbA1c （8.37±0.43）% in the nursing group （t等于0.398 2, P等于0.691 7）. After intervention, FBG （6.76±1.03）mmol/L in the psychological care group and FBG（7.94±1.77）mmol/L in the conventional care group were significantly different （t等于3.408 8, P等于0.001 1）. After intervention, the level of PBG（8.66±0.74）mmol/L in the psychological care group and FBG （9.45±1.44） mmol/L in the conventional nursing group were significantly different（t等于2.886 7, P等于0.005 2）. The levels of HbA1c （7.14±0.16）% and HbA1c （7.66±0.34）% in the psychological nursing group were significantly different （t等于8.186 9, P等于0.000 0）. Before intervention, SAS scores （53.12±1.45）points in psychotherapy group and SAS scores （53.15±1.46）points in routine care group had no significant difference （t等于0.086 2, P等于0.931 5）. After intervention, SAS scores （49.76±1.22） in psychotherapy group and SAS group （51.34±1.37）points in routine care group were significantly different （t等于5.095 4, P等于0.000 0）. Before intervention, SDS score of psychotherapy group （55.46±2.11）points was significantly higher than that of routine care group （55.49±2.13）points, there was no significant difference（t等于0.059 1, P等于0.953 0）. After intervention, the scores of SDS （51.02±1.05）points and SDS （53.46±1.55）points in the nursing group were significantly different （t等于7.710 4, P等于0.000 0）. Conclusion Psychological nursing intervention plays an important role in the rehabilitation of elderly diabetic patients, which helps to control patients’ blood glucose, improve their life quality and improve their unhealthy psychology. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
总结:这篇糖尿病患者论文范文为免费优秀学术论文范文,可用于相关写作参考。
参考文献：
1、 综合护理干预在老年糖尿病合并高血压患者中应用 [摘要] 目的 研究分析综合护理干预在老年糖尿病合并高血压患者中的应用效果。方法 将2014年1月—2015年12月在该院治疗的老年糖尿病合并高。
2、 心理护理干预应用于糖尿病足疼痛护理中效果 DOI：10 16658 j cnki 1672-4062 2017 13 146[摘要] 目的 探究心理护理干预应用于糖尿病足疼痛护理中的效。
3、 全面规范护理干预对妊娠糖尿病患者血糖水平影响 [摘要] 目的 探讨全面规范护理干预对妊娠糖尿病患者血糖水平的影响。方法 将2016年3月—2017年3月期间该院收治的70例妊娠糖尿病患者随机。
4、 护理干预对老年糖尿病患者代谢指标与生活质量的影响评价 [摘要] 目的 观察护理干预对老年糖尿病患者代谢指标及生活质量的影响情况。方法 选取该院60例老年糖尿病患者（2015年11月—2016年11月。
5、 综合护理干预在老年糖尿病合并高血压患者中影响分析 [摘要] 目的 探讨综合护理干预在老年糖尿病合并高血压患者中的影响。方法 将2015年4月—2017年4月在该院接受治疗的老年糖尿病合并高血压患。